
I was wondering about the Bayanihan Linux licensing claim that it is free only for educational and Non-profit use, but a license in required for commercial use.
As a Debian based distribution, they are bound by the Debian social contract, and should be free.
As a product of a government institution paid for by taxpayer’s money, it should be free.
Even if we push aside those issues, if it wants to be the "national Linux," then it should be free so it can be adopted by Internet Cafes so they would have the same Linux in Cafes as they would have in schools.
Also, making it free also means that business would be more willing to adopt it, creating a justification for schools to use it because that is what businesses use.
By insisting on a "commercial" license, Bayanihan Linux is just killing itself and preventing the adoption of what could be a "National Linux".
No comments
Post a Comment